Made Cholest
Saturday, May 15th, 2010Made Cholest
"Nature Made", "Cholest-Off" to "24% of average" cholesterol reduction, is there a problem with this?
SAMI, do not tell "to" and "In the middle" in an advertisement, Cause you any problem? Apparently, Gandalf, SAMI (same as seller), has no problem with figures throw their $ $. Thanks K, A Site, the studies are not mentioned. I do not remember much about my use of statistics before, but his statement raised a red flag. I did a search in Medline On "Reducol" and "Phytrol" (2004 A), and Nothing found. K, on the day, I call "Vanity Diaries." K, I had in mind not to reputable journals, newspapers in particular, there are only so a company or person can that are published, does not usually review. K, I Do not Know What Medline, me, I hope they are all reputable peer-reviewed journals, I do not have Scam-Artists or Con-artists of the "Study", Review makes it legitimate.
A statement like this leads me to believe that this study was not performed. Me explained: "Until" implies that if a study was conducted, the extreme or peripheral has been quoted from a simple set of results …. results does not mean nothing. enclaves and extreme scores skew a distribution that can seriously affect the assumptions involved in the use of analysis in particular, but also the validity and reliability results. The researchers do not usually keep them in the analysis, unless it can be shown not to have occurred by several errors, and in fact represent the sampled population. And this is very rarely the case. Statistical analysis require normal distributions. Therefore, efforts to standardize data (eg, a transformation logarithmic) should be carried out if the cases remained … However, statistical significance is not based on a "series" of scores. The ranges are descriptive characteristics of a sample. If there is no meaning, then there is no "effect" of treatment. The use of "means", although the same sentence leads me to believe that no studies were even performed. See in the statistical analysis, the percentages can be calculated on precise figures within a confidence interval of 95%. For example, in regression, ETA gives the square of the percentage of variance explained by particular independent variables. "As a percentage given an average "does not have an ounce of sense. Obviously, it sucks. Fancy, aspiring statistical terms have been used mistakenly to mislead people to believe there is any scientific basis for the claims. But, hey, in today's world, knowledge, evidence, and even the logic of not selling products. Sex, manipulation, subliminal messages, anecdotes, the prospect of making money, and live up to unattainable, unrealistic rules of society does. If the performance empirical base of any product, why do not the advertisers or manufacturers to quote the magazine published? I think these advertisers may have done a better job to falsify. At least there was a woman with large breasts to utter the statement. JA! I have no idea how most of the ads when they are clearly being scams. PS. I think something is wrong with your regular mail. I emailed you back and got an error message (ie "service unavailable"). He attempted to send back but also opted to write the Y! A "mdgreg link." EDIT: Well, then they're full of shit as many advertisers, many others. If the study was that it would be boasted, right? I could give them the benefit of the doubt and says: "Maybe the statistics were erroneously reported. "That is * not * happen all the time, which is a huge pete peeve of mine. But no study cited = bullsh * t in my mind. And, yes definitely a red flag. Even if you discounted all Mombo Jomba I mentioned, the statement is not even logical: "Even a percentage of the" average. So the results (or mostly a score * *) in a range of media. Whaaaa? EDIT 2: Interesting, but hardly surprising. I've heard through advertisements that claim to make "their" own "private" or "within the company" experiments. Have you heard this? I remember that the company "Vichy" making these claims. I remember this ad for Vichy. I suspect however, that these "experiments" not would have just as reliability and validity as no study at all. If "real" MD, PhD or statistics were hired to conduct the investigation, and again, why are not published results or details (such as the methodology and statistics) at least on the website? EDIT 3: Why Diaries vanity? Hmm, interesting … I can not think of many reasons for the name of Nick. You mean the "publish or perish" mentality of the teachers covered, How a magazine aims to be different (if not better) than other … although it accepts the same type of works such as "reputation" is exaggerated and attributed significance far beyond reality, or whether they refer to stuffed shirts how to use literature to attribute meaning to their lives, to build self-esteem and feel "worthy" within their own brains? HA-HA …. Or do you mean something completely different? EDIT 4: Ahhh, I knew it would be a valid explanation. Obviously there is a difference between peer-reviewed and non peer review. I think there is too much disconnect between the different areas of knowledge, but also between work empirical and public awareness. No peer reviewed sources may contribute to .. in the minds of some. In my mind a clear difference, however. "Magazines" against the magazines. I'm not even sure non-peer reviewed sources can be found using Medline, PsycLIT, school or other search engines … Are you doing a distinction beyond peer-reviewed versus non-peer-reviewed journals? Or do you mean something else for not peer reviewed? I think not peer reviewed "Magazines" for magazines, including articles from "Popular Science" maybe … articles are not empirical or theoretical studies / clinical trials and reviewed not by editorial board of experts, etc. 5 EDIT: Yes, you're right. I do not think I've ever read an article or something that claims to be a magazine real science. Magazine articles, Well, of course. But no, something from a source claiming to be a real magazine without a review board of experts, where items are not subject to regular review and standards, etc. I would like though. I like to read the article but also the "comments" of "editors" / Alias, scammers …. just to learn something …. or, uhhh, perhaps to develop some new contempt for the world works. LOL! … Maybe I do not think enough or correctly. I can not believe I have not come across this sort of thing …
|
|
1 NATURE MADE CHOLEST OFF 120 Tabs LOWERS CHOLESTEROL $12.95 |
|
|
2 Nature Made CHOLEST OFF 120 CAPLETS each $14.99 |
|
|
NATURE MADE CHOLEST-OFF REDUCE CHOLESTEROL 240 CT $24.99 |
|
|
NATURE MADE CHOLEST-OFF REDUCE CHOLESTEROL 240 CT $24.99 |
|
|
✓ NIB ✓ Nature Made CHOLEST OFF Cholesterol Fighter, 60 $0.99 |
|
|
NATURE MADE CHOLEST-OFF 240 CAPLETS CHOLESTEROL FORMULA $21.99 |
|
|
3 * NATURE MADE CHOLEST-OFF 240 CAPLETS CHOLESTEROL $62.99 |
|
|
360 NATURE MADE CHOLEST OFF COMPLETE CAPLETS sealed $44.99 |
|
|
NATURE MADE CHOLEST-OFF REDUCE CHOLESTEROL 240 CT $24.99 |
|
|
480 Nature Made CHOLEST OFF COMPLETE Dietary Supplement $39.99 |
|
|
Nature Made Cholest Off Reduce Cholesterol-240 Capsules $34.99 |
|
|
Nature Made Cholest Off 60 Tablets $12.00 |
|
|
2 bottles NATURE MADE MULTI + CHOLEST OFF * 120 TABLETS $6.99 |
|
|
NATURE MADE MULTI + CHOLEST OFF * 60 TABLETS $5.99 |
|
|
Nature Made Cholest-Off 240 Caplets Reduce Cholesterol $39.99 |
|
|
2 bottles NATURE MADE CHOLEST OFF COMPLETE* 120 CAPLETS $8.99 |
|
|
NATURE MADE CHOLEST OFF- REDUCE CHOLESTEROL 240 ct $19.95 |
|
|
CHOLESTOFF NATURE MADE CHOLEST OFF 60 CAPLETS $5.88 |
|
|
CHOLEST OFF by NATURE MADE 60+20=80 CAPLETS EXP.04/2010 $9.99 |
|
|
NATURE MADE CHOLEST OFF 60 TABLETS ( NEW ) $6.50 |
|
|
NATURE MADE CHOLEST OFF 60 TABLETS $11.99 |
|
|
Cholest Off, Reduces Cholesterol Naturally, Nature Made $11.69 |
|
|
120 Nature Made CHOLEST OFF COMPLETE Dietary Supplement $9.99 |
|
|
NATURE MADE CHOLEST OFF LOWER CHOLESTEROL 240 TABLETS $24.99 |
|
|
Cholest Off, Reduces Cholesterol Naturally, Nature Made $11.69 |
|
|
Nature Made Cholest Off, Cholesterol Fighter, Caplets $16.95 |
|
|
NEW Nature Made Cholest Off for Cholesterol, 240 Pills $25.99 |
|
|
Nature Made CholestOff Cholest Off Complete 60 Capsules $8.99 |
|
|
Nature Made CholestOff Cholest Off 120 Capsules $15.99 |
|
|
Nature Made Multi + CholestOff Cholest Off 60 Tablets $8.99 |
|
|
(2) Nature Made Cholest-Off 240 Caplets **480 Caplets** $35.00 |
|
|
NATURE MADE CHOLEST OFF- REDUCE CHOLESTEROL 240 $24.99 |
|
|
NATURE MADE CHOLEST OFF- REDUCE CHOLESTEROL 240 $24.99 |
|
|
CHOLESTOFF NATURE MADE CHOLEST OFF 60 CAPLETS NIB $5.99 |
|
|
2 Bottles Nature Made Cholest Off 120 Capsules $13.00 |
|
|
Nature Made CholestOff 240 Caplets per Bottle $17.89 Even if you watch your diet and exercise regularly it may not be enough to lower your cholesterol to heart healthy levels. Thats where Nature Made CholestOff can help. CholestOff is an all-natural drug free blend of plant sterols and stanols, called Reducol which has been clinically proven to block cholesterol absorption and reduce LDL (bad) cholesterol in as few as 21 days. CholestOff is safe and… |
|
|
NATURE MADE CHOLEST-OFF 240 CAPLETS CHOLESTEROL FORMULA (PACK of 3) (EXP:05/2012) $61.99 CholestOff lowers cholesterol naturally and may reduce the risk of heart disease. CholestOff provides the extra 1.8 grams of plant sterols and stanols daily that many Americans need to reach National Institute of Health’s guidelines. The average reduction in LDL cholesterol in six clinical studies of 3 weeks or longer supporting Reducol, the active ingredient found in Nature Made CholestOff, was 3… |
|
|
Nature Made Cholest-off 240 Caplets – Clinically Proven to Reduce Cholesterol (2 Pack) $37.29 Diet and exercise alone don’t always reduce your cholesterol levels to the desired range. That’s where Nature Made Cholest-Off can help. Cholest-Off is clinically proven to reduce LDL (”bad”) cholesterol and total cholesterol by blocking cholesterol absorption. As a result, taken as directed, Cholest-Off will lower your cholesterol levels and help support your cardiovascular health. As part of a c… |